Because you asked...Invert Sugar

>> Thursday, May 28, 2009

A reader recently sent me an e-mail asking me if I knew anything about a mysterious ingredient called "liquid invert sugar" that was on the ingredient list of some granola bars he bought at Target. Great question! Funny, the ingredient has never registered with me, but I noticed on the ingredient list of another product the next day at the grocery store.

So...what is liquid invert sugar? Invert sugar is sucrose (a disaccharide of glucose and fructose) that has been broken into free glucose and free fructose. (Sound familiar? That's what HFCS is too - free glucose and free fructose - only the beginning ingredients and processing are completely different.) Invert sugar is sweeter than table sugar (sucrose) because fructose is sweeter than both sucrose and glucose.

Invert sugar is found naturally in honey and maple syrup. In fact, invert sugar is often referred to as "artificial honey," though it doesn't have any of the wonderful little goodies that honey (or maple syrup, for that matter) contain.

Invert sugar is sold as a liquid as either total invert sugar (50% fructose, 50% glucose) or as a mixture of half sucrose and half invert sugar (50% sucrose, 25% fructose, and 25% glucose).


Why use it? Invert sugar has a lot of desirable properties in baked goods and other processed foods. The sugar crystals in invert sugar are smaller than sucrose, which results in a smoother texture of the final product. The smaller crystals also dissolve faster than sucrose crystals. Invert sugar retains moisture better and improves shelf life. As little as 10-15% of invert sugar mixed with sucrose markedly reduces crystallization in the final product, resulting in longer shelf life as well. All the reasons that manufacturers like HFCS apply to invert sugar.

How is it made? Invert sugar is manufactured a couple of different ways - acid hydrolysis and enzymatic inversion. In acid hydrolysis, sucrose is subjected to acid and heat to break it into glucose and fructose. Many different acids can be used, including citric acid. The process is not perfect, however. Conversion of sucrose to glucose and fructose is low (around 40-70% from what I've read), and energy consumption and cost of production are high. Impurities from polymerization products are an issue with acid hydrolysis of sucrose.

Enzymatic inversion of sucrose is achieved using a yeast derived enzyme known as Invertase. Conversion of nearly 100% can be achieved through enzymatic inversion. Low temperatures can be used with enzymatic inversion eliminating polymerization products (and improving final flavor), and filtering of the Invertase is easy. Enzymatic inversion is not cheap, however, so both methods of inversion appear to be in use.

The home cook can also make invert sugar and in fact does so when making jellies or jams. Mixing sugar with citric acid, cream of tartar, or fresh lemon juice and boiling will result in some sugar inversion - enough to keep the remaining sucrose from recrystallizing.

Should I use Invert Sugar? Again, this is a personal decision. We avoid HFCS (of course) and also fructose as ingredients preferring to limit our free fructose consumption to natural products (like fruits, honey, and maple syrup) that have more to offer. Because of that, we'll probably also add invert sugar as a specific ingredient to our list of things to avoid, but I'm not going to be concerned about the invert sugar that is in jellies and other baked goods where it might form during the baking process.


Hmmm... Learning about invert sugar production does make me wonder how much sucrose if converted to fructose and glucose in our stomachs. I've heard the argument that HFCS is processed the same as sucrose in our bodies because sucrose breaks down into fructose and glucose in the highly acidic environment of our stomachs. I would love to know what the conversion of sucrose to free glucose and free fructose is in our body - something I haven't come across yet. Just one of those things I wonder about.

Keep your questions coming!

10 comments:

Kathryn May 29, 2009 3:09 PM  

I don't know much about the chemistry of these things. But i don't believe HFCS is utilized by the body in the same way as sucrose. Triglycerides are raised & fat stored with HFCS much more than sucrose. It is my belief that it interferes with the ability to feel full as well.

cathy May 29, 2009 3:23 PM  

Kathryn - It's controversial. We've given up HFCS in part because of the possibility of HFCS being processed the way you mention. (We have more reasons for not consuming it, but the underlying health aspect of consuming HFCS was our original driving force.) Too much fructose in any form has been shown to have the health effects that you mention.

BUT, there is a current thought in the research world that sucrose and HFCS might be processed the same way - because sucrose separates into fructose and glucose when in contact with stomach acid making sucrose and HFCS pretty much the same once in your stomach. Personally, I think that it will be a long time before we fully understand the health ramifications of HFCS and am happy to have it out of our house!

Amy May 29, 2009 3:32 PM  

Thanks for that thoughtful post Cathy. I feel like I need to think of a sugar related question, just because I love your answers.

I have never seen invert sugar on a label, but I will probably notice now.

laura May 29, 2009 4:29 PM  

Very interesting. Mostly a rhetorical question, but I'm curious whether invert sugar will start getting used more and more as a way to get the more well-known HFCS off the ingredients list.

cathy May 29, 2009 4:35 PM  

Laura - I doubt it. It's substantially more expensive than HFCS, and more expensive than sucrose. I'd guess that the companies that move away from HFCS simply switch to sucrose. It does seem to have its niche, though, so maybe I'll be proven wrong!

Jon (was) in Michigan May 30, 2009 5:44 AM  

Thanks for the post. I had a big discussion about invert sugar with a friend a while back. I had the chemical make up totally wrong (I was thinking it was an enantiomer because of the "invert" name). I think we concluded it was ok. It sounds like you are on the fence about it, so I'm not worried about it at the moment.

Lori May 31, 2009 2:53 PM  

Very informative post. I haven't come across invert sugar. I'll have to keep my eye out. I'm interested in the controversy regarding how it is utilized as well.

Courtenay May 31, 2009 9:30 PM  

Great blog post! I appreciate the information you share as it helps me make informed decisions when feeding my family.

I have another question regarding fat. Is butter bad for you? I was under the impression that butter (within moderation) is fine because it is natural (as opposed to margarine). Some information that I read recently on a "healthy living" blog made me feel like I should be avoiding butter at all costs. I've also read that canola oil is better than other oils. Why is that?

I'm confused when it comes to fats. Which fats should I be feeding my family and why?

cathy June 1, 2009 6:34 AM  

Jon - Love that you were discussing invert sugar! Just as an FYI, they call it invert sugar because when measuring sugar concentration using polarimeter, plane-polarized light is rotated to the right through a sucrose solution and to the left (opposite) in an invert sugar solution. So light is "inverted" through the invert sugar solution.

Courtenay - Are you reading my mind? Great questions about fat! I'm actually working on a post on saturated fat for hopefully later this week. It's not as clear cut as it seems, and you are definitely asking the right kinds of questions! I hope to have another post on canola oil soon too. So, hate to leave you hanging, but check back soon!

James Hubbard, M.D., M.P.H. June 1, 2009 11:05 AM  

Great informative post, Cathy. Thanks

  © Blogger templates Sunset by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP